Adam Cooman

Previous

Linearized active circuits:
transfer functions and stability

Next

Appendix 1: Proof that lossy transmission lines are realistic

In this appendix, we prove that lossy transmission lines with frequency independent parameters are realistic.

Lemma A.1: The impedance matrix Z ⁣(s)Z\!\left(s\right) and admittance matrix Y ⁣(s)Y\!\left(s\right) of a transmission line with positive real Zl(s)Z_{l}\left(s\right) and Yl(s)Y_{l}\left(s\right) are positive real.

Proof: Let I1I_1 and I2I_2 be the currents entering each terminal of the transmission line and V1V_1 and V2V_2 be the potentials at each terminal. Let us write

P:=V1I1ˉ+V2I2ˉ=V(0)I(0)V()I()=0(Vx(ξ)I(ξ)+V(ξ)Iˉx(ξ))dξ.\begin{align*} P & := & V_{1}\,\bar{I_{1}}+V_{2}\,\bar{I_{2}}=V(0)\,\overline{I(0)}-V(\ell)\,\overline{I(\ell)}\\ & = & -\int_{0}^{\ell}\left(\dfrac{\partial V}{\partial x}(\xi)\,\overline{I(\xi)}+V(\xi)\,\dfrac{\partial\bar{I}}{\partial x}(\xi)\right)\,\text{d}\xi. \end{align*}

Replacing V/x\partial V/\partial x and I/x\partial I/\partial x by their values in terms of II and VV deduced from Equation (4.1), we obtain:

P=0(Zl(s)I(ξ)2Yl(s)V(ξ)2)dξP=-\int_{0}^{\ell}\left(-Z_{l}\left(s\right)\,|I(\xi)|^{2}-\overline{Y_{l}\left(s\right)}\,|V(\xi)|^{2}\right)\,\text{d}\xi

therefore the real part of PP, (P)\Re(P), is given by

(P)=0{Zl(s)}I(ξ)2+{Yl(s)}V(ξ)2dξ.(A.1)\Re(P)=\int_{0}^{\ell}\Re\left\{ Z_{l}\left(s\right)\right\} \,|I(\xi)|^{2}+\Re\left\{ Y_{l}\left(s\right)\right\} \,|V(\xi)|^{2}\,\text{d}\xi . \tag{A.1}

Clearly the integrand is positive for (s)0\Re(s)\ge0, hence (V1I1ˉ+V2I2ˉ)\Re(V_{1}\,\bar{I_{1}}+V_{2}\,\bar{I_{2}}) is positive when (s)0\Re(s)\ge0. This in turn implies that both Y ⁣(s)Y\!\left(s\right) and Z ⁣(s)Z\!\left(s\right) are positive real.

Theorem A.1: A transmission line for which R,L,G,CR,L,G,C are strictly positive is realistic.

Proof: Let Z(s)Z(s) be the impedance of the line shown in (4.4) and set λ=max{R/L,G/C}<0\lambda=\max\{-R/L,-G/C\}<0. As γ(s)\gamma(s) and z0(s)z_{0}(s) are analytic and non-vanishing in the half-plane Πλ={s:(s)>λ}\Pi_{\lambda}=\{s:\,\Re(s) >\lambda\}, and since moreover γ\gamma is never pure imaginary in Πλ\Pi_{\lambda}, the matrix ZZ is analytic there. As det(Z(s))=z02\det(Z(s))=z_{0}^{2}, we get that Y=Z1Y=Z^{-1} is likewise analytic. From (A.1) and the symmetry of ZZ, YY, we observe that Z(s)+Z(s)=2(Z(s))Z(s)+Z^{*}(s)=2\Re(Z(s)) and Y(s)+Y(s)=2(Y(s))Y(s)+Y^{*}(s)=2\Re(Y(s)) are positive symmetric matrices in Πλ\Pi_{\lambda} whose entries, being real parts of analytic functions, are harmonic functions of ss. They are in fact positive definite at each sΠλs\in\Pi_{\lambda}, as (A.1) implies if I1=x1+iy1I_{1}=x_{1}+iy_{1} and I2=x2+iy2I_{2}=x_{2}+iy_{2} are not both zero that

(P)=(x1,x2)(Z(s))(x1,x2)t+(y1,y2)(Z(s))(y1,y2)t>0\Re(P)= (x_{1},x_{2})\Re(Z(s))(x_{1},x_{2})^{t}+(y_{1},y_{2})\Re(Z(s))(y_{1},y_{2})^{t}>0

(for in this case (Zl(s))>0\Re(Z_l(s))>0 and I(ξ)I(\xi) is not identically zero). We claim that

(Y(jω))αId  for some α>0,(A.2)\Re(Y(j\omega))\geq\alpha\mathbf{Id}\ \textrm{ for some }\alpha>0,\tag{A.2}

and this will imply that (i)(i) of Definition 3.1 is met. Indeed, if (A.2) holds and uR2u\in\R^{2} is a unit vector, the function ut(Y)u-u^{t}\Re(Y)u is a nonpositive harmonic function in Π0\Pi_{0} whose limit at every point of the imaginary axis exists and is at most α-\alpha, therefore ut(Y)u-u^{t}\Re(Y)u is at most α-\alpha everywhere in Π0\Pi_{0} by the extended maximum principle [37]. To prove (A.2), we may restrict to large ω|\omega| because on any compact interval of the imaginary axis it certainly holds by strict positivity of (Y(jω))\Re(Y(j\omega)) and continuity of the latter with respect to ω\omega. Without loss of generality, we choose the branch of the square root which is positive for positive arguments. In view of (4.4), we can write:

Y=z01[1+e2γ1e2γ2eγ1e2γ2eγ1e2γ1+e2γ1e2γ]=z01M.(A.3)Y=z_{0}^{-1}\left[\begin{array}{cc} \dfrac{1+e^{-2\gamma}}{1-e^{-2\gamma}} & -\dfrac{2e^{-\gamma}}{1-e^{-2\gamma}}\\[0.3cm] -\dfrac{2e^{-\gamma}}{1-e^{-2\gamma}} & \dfrac{1+e^{-2\gamma}}{1-e^{-2\gamma}}\\[0.3cm] \end{array}\right]=z_{0}^{-1}M. \tag{A.3}

Since z0(jω)L/C>0z_{0}(j\omega)\to\sqrt{L/C}>0 when ω±\omega\to\pm\infty and the matrix MM in (A.3) is symmetric, it is enough to show that M(jω)M(j\omega) is bounded and that the eigenvalues of (M(jω))\Re(M(j\omega)) are greater than some δ>0\delta>0 for ω|\omega| large enough. Now, using the Taylor expansion of (1+x)1/2(1+x)^{1/2} at x0x\sim0, we get

γ(jω)=LC(jω+RC+GL2LC+O(ω1))\gamma(j\omega)=\sqrt{LC}\Bigl(j\omega+\dfrac{RC+GL}{2 LC}+O\bigl(|\omega|^{-1}\bigr)\Bigr)

so that (γ(jω))κ=RC+GL3LC>0\Re(\gamma(j\omega))\geq\kappa=\frac{RC+GL}{3\sqrt{LC}}>0, say, for ω|\omega| large enough. Then e2γ(jω)eκ<1|e^{-2\gamma(j\omega)}|\leq e^{-\kappa}<1, hence M(jω)M(j\omega) is bounded. To prove that the eigenvalues of (M(jω))\Re(M(j\omega)) are greater than δ>0\delta>0, we check that its trace and determinant are positive with det((M(jω)))η>0\det\big(\Re(M(j\omega))\big)\geq\eta>0 for ω|\omega| large. Since the trace is bounded (recall M(jω)M(j\omega) is bounded), we will be done. First, it is readily seen that

tr(M(jω))=21e4(γ(jω))1e2γ2\textrm{tr}\,\Re(M(j\omega))=2\dfrac{1-e^{-4\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}}{|1-e^{-2\gamma}|^{2}}

is indeed positive. Next, a short computation yields that

det((M(jω)))=(1e4(γ(jω)))21e2γ44((eγ(jω)eγ(jω)2γˉ(jω)))21e2γ4=(1 ⁣ ⁣e4(γ(jω)) ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣+2cos(γ(jω))e(γ(jω))(1e2(γ(jω))))×(1 ⁣ ⁣e4(γ(jω)) ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣2cos(γ(jω))e(γ(jω))(1e2(γ(jω))))×1e2γ4.\begin{array}{ll} \det\big(\Re(M(j\omega))\big) & =\dfrac{(1-e^{-4\Re(\gamma(j\omega))})^{2}}{|1-e^{-2\gamma}|^{4}} \\ & -4\dfrac{(\Re(e^{-\gamma(j\omega)}-e^{-\gamma(j\omega)-2\bar{\gamma}(j\omega)}))^{2}}{|1-e^{-2\gamma}|^{4}} \\ =\Bigl(1\!-\!e^{-4\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}\!\! & \!\!+2\cos(\Im\gamma(j\omega))e^{-\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}(1-e^{-2\Re(\gamma(j\omega))})\Bigr) \\ \times\Bigl(1\!-\!e^{-4\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}\!\! & \!\!-2\cos(\Im\gamma(j\omega))e^{-\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}(1-e^{-2\Re(\gamma(j\omega))})\Bigr) \\ & \times|1-e^{-2\gamma}|^{-4}. \end{array}

So, we are left to prove that

1 ⁣ ⁣e4(γ(jω)) ⁣ ⁣±2cos(γ(jω))e(γ(jω))(1e2(γ(jω)))1\!-\!e^{-4\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}\!\!\pm2\cos(\Im\gamma(j\omega))e^{-\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}(1-e^{-2\Re(\gamma(j\omega))})

is positive and bounded away from 00 for ω|\omega| large enough. As 0< ⁣e(γ(jω)) ⁣ ⁣< ⁣eκ ⁣ ⁣< ⁣10<\!e^{-\Re(\gamma(j\omega))}\!\!<\!e^{-\kappa}\!\!<\!1, this comes from the fact that

12x+2x3x4=(1x)3(1+x)1-2x+2x^{3}-x^{4}=(1-x)^{3}(1+x)

is strictly positive for x(0,1)x\in(0,1). The same argument with z01z_{0}^{-1} replaced by z0z_{0} in (A.3) gives us (ii)(ii) of Definition 3.1.

Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 
Next