Adam Cooman

Previous

Distortion Contribution Analysis
with the Best Linear Approximation

Next

Appendices

Appendix 1: Power dependence of the BLA and the distortion

In this appendix, we demonstrate how the BLA and non-linear distortion change in function of the power of the input multisines and how both can be different from the results obtained with a single-tone or two-tone excitation signal. Consider the following static non-linearity y=tanh(u)y = \text{tanh}(u) which is a saturation function that closely resembles the voltage-to-current transfer function of a bipolar transistor [35] or a MOST differential pair biased in weak inversion [36]. The validity of the harmonic distortion scaling rules in function of the input power is verified by applying a single-tone, two-tone and random-odd RPM (Section 2.1) to this weakly nonlinear function (Figure A.1). Even though the different excitations result in a different absolute value for the distortion component, this specific example shows that for static weakly non-linear systems the same scaling rules for 2nd\mathrm{2^{nd}}-order distortion (1 dBW/dBW) and 3th\mathrm{3^{th}}-order distortion (2 dBW/dBW) apply until compression occurs.

In a more realistic setting (low-noise amplifier in 90 nm CMOS), large discrepancies in the inter-modulation distortion between two-tones and multisines were documented (Figure A.2) [16]. In the case of the two-tone, a local minimum (the so-called sweet-spot) appears which gives a wrong impression about the actual inter-modulation distortion present in the circuit when complex modulated signals are used.

alt

Figure A.1 Applying different excitation signals to a weakly nonlinear system y=tanh(u)y = \text{tanh}(u) reveals that different harmonic distortion levels are obtained.

alt

Figure A.2 The inter-modulation distortion reveals a clear local minimum with a two-tone excitation. This minimum dissapears completely when a multisine excitation is used. The figure is adapted from [16].

Appendix 2: Obtaining expression (3.5)

In the circuit shown in Figure 3.1, the following equations describe the behaviour of the input, output and feedback dynamics:

U=ARMY(A.1)\mathbf{U} =\mathbf{A}R-\mathbf{M}\mathbf{Y} \tag{A.1}
Yt=BY(A.2)Y_{t} =\mathbf{B}\mathbf{Y} \tag{A.2}

The relation between U\mathbf{U} and Y\mathbf{Y} is given by the BLA:

Y=GUYBLAU+D(A.3)\mathbf{Y}=\mathbf{G}_{\mathbf{U}\rightarrow\mathbf{Y}}^{\mathrm{BLA}}\mathbf{U}+\mathbf{D} \tag{A.3}

Plugging equation (A.1) into (A.3) and solving for Y\mathbf{Y}, we obtain:

Y=(IN+GUYBLAM)1(GUYBLAAR+D)\mathbf{Y} = \left(\mathbf{I}_{N}+\mathbf{G}_{\mathbf{U}\rightarrow\mathbf{Y}}^{\mathrm{BLA}}\mathbf{M}\right)^{-1}\left(\mathbf{G}_{\mathbf{U}\rightarrow\mathbf{Y}}^{\mathrm{BLA}}\mathbf{A}R+\mathbf{D}\right)

Using this expression in (A.2) and grouping the terms in RR and D\mathbf{D} yields equation (3.5).

Appendix 3: BLA with S-parameters

To calculate the contributions of the distortion sources to the output of the circuit, an algorithm similar to the one described in [25] is used. The different S-matrices of the components in the circuit shown in Figure 4.1 are gathered in a matrix T\mathbf{T}, while the distortion sources are gathered in a vector N\mathbf{N}:

T=[ΓinΓoutPSABBLA]N=[000P+2×1D]\mathbf{T}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc} \Gamma_{\mathrm{in}}\\ & \Gamma_{\mathrm{out}}\\ & & \mathbf{P}\\ & & & \mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{A}\rightarrow\mathbf{B}}^{\mathrm{BLA}} \end{array}\right]\quad\mathbf{N}=\left[\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0\\ \mathbf{0}_{P+2\times1}\\ \mathbf{D} \end{array}\right]

where Γin\Gamma_{\mathrm{in}} and Γout\Gamma_{\mathrm{out}} are the reflection factors presented to the circuit by the reference source and load respectively. SABBLA\mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{A}\rightarrow\mathbf{B}}^{\mathrm{BLA}} is the block diagonal matrix of size P ⁣× ⁣PP\!\times\!P which contains the BLAs of the circuits as defined in equation (4.1). D\mathbf{D} is the vector of distortion sources of length PP defined in the same expression. P\mathbf{P} is the S-matrix of the package defined in Figure 4.1 of size (P+2) ⁣× ⁣(P+2)\left(P+2\right)\!\times\!\left(P+2\right) for a circuit with 22 external ports.

The interconnection between the different parts of the circuit is represented by the following matrix:

C=[02×2I2×2I2×202×204×P0P×40P×PIP×PIP×P0P×P]\mathbf{C}=\left[\begin{array}{cc} \begin{array}{cc} \mathbf{0}_{2\times2} & \mathbf{I}_{2\times2}\\ \mathbf{I}_{2\times2} & \mathbf{0}_{2\times2} \end{array} & \mathbf{0}_{4\times P}\\ \mathbf{0}_{P\times4} & \begin{array}{cc} \mathbf{0}_{P\times P} & \mathbf{I}_{P\times P}\\ \mathbf{I}_{P\times P} & \mathbf{0}_{P\times P} \end{array} \end{array}\right]

The incident-waves at all ports generated by the sources in N\mathbf{N} is given by the following expression:

Aall=(CT)1N=W1N(A.4)\mathbf{A}_{\mathrm{all}}= \left(\mathbf{C}-\mathbf{T}\right)^{-1}\mathbf{N}=\mathbf{W}^{-1}\mathbf{N} \tag{A.4}

Since we are only interested in the wave incident to the load, just the second row of W1\mathbf{W}^{-1} is used. Also, the first P+4P+4 elements of W1\mathbf{W}^{-1} can be ignored, because the first P+4P+4 elements of N\mathbf{N} are zero. This finally leads to the expression for Tout\mathbf{T}_{\mathrm{out}} used in equation (4.3):

Tout=[W1]2,P+5..2P+4\mathbf{T}_{\mathrm{out}}=\left[\mathbf{W}^{-1}\right]_{2,P+5..2P+4}

Appendix 4: Predicting the BLA from reference to the waves in the circuit

Predicting the frequency response from the main reference signal to the input and output waves at the ports of the sub-circuits is done using the same matrix W1\mathbf{W}^{-1} as was used in Appendix 3. but now, the N\mathbf{N}-vector is set to the following:

N=[1ΓS2Z002P+1×1]\mathbf{N}=\left[\begin{array}{c} \frac{1-\Gamma_{S}}{2\sqrt{Z_{0}}}\\ \mathbf{0}_{2P+1\times1} \end{array}\right]

where Z0Z_{0} is the chosen reference impedance and ΓS\Gamma_{S} is the reflection factor presented by the reference source. All A-waves in the circuit are now predicted by (A.4). The frequency response from the reference voltage source to the A-waves radiating into the sub-circuits are found at [Aall]4+P+1..4+2P,1\left[\mathbf{A}_{\mathrm{all}}\right]_{4+P+1..4+2P,1}. The frequency response from the reference voltage source to the B-waves at the ports of the sub-circuits are found at [Aall]5..5+P,1\left[\mathbf{A}_{\mathrm{all}}\right]_{5..5+P,1}.

Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 
Next